184 | 0 | 21 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在推进乡村全面振兴的战略背景下,乡村建设面临“形式主义整治”与“缺乏内生动力”的双重困境,价值创造不足成为亟待突破的核心问题。本文提出“人地产融合”作为乡村建设的理论视角,以协同治理为实践路径,探索风貌营造与可持续发展的价值创造系统。研究首先梳理“人地产融合”理念与台湾地区“地方创生”实践的理论溯源,并在此基础上回顾乡村风貌研究从物质形态到社会—空间—产业系统的演进历程;随后,构建“三要素融合、多主体协同、全周期管理”的分析框架;并以福建莆田市湄洲岛宫周片区为实证案例,深入剖析改造实践中的关键难点与利益主体冲突,展现了通过风貌提升、产业转型与数字化赋能所实现的多维价值创造过程。研究表明,基于“人地产融合”的协同治理模式系统性创造了物质环境、经济发展、社会文化和生态保育的综合价值;多元主体的合作不仅提高了乡村风貌管控的精准性,也在村民参与和收益机制上形成了正向激励,呈现出风貌提升与价值创造的良性循环。本研究旨在丰富乡村建设与设计理论,并为类似村庄在实践中提供可操作的协同治理和价值创造路径。
Abstract:Under the strategic impetus of promoting comprehensive rural revitalisation, rural construction currently faces dual challenges of "formalistic governance" and "lack of endogenous momentum", thus making inadequate value creation a core issue in urgent need of resolution. This paper proposes "people±land±industry integration" as a theoretical perspective for rural construction, employing collaborative governance as a practical approach to explore a value creation system that combines landscape enhancement with sustainable development. First, it traces the theoretical origins of the concept of "people±land±industry integration", drawing on the experience of Taiwan region in "place±making". It then reviews how rural landscape research has evolved from a focus on physical form into a more comprehensive socio-spatial-industrial system. Building upon these insights, the paper constructs an analytical framework characterised by "three-element integration, multi±stakeholder collaboration, and full-cycle management". Taking the Gongzhou area of Meizhou Island in Putian City, Fujian Province, as an empirical case, the study provides an in-depth examination of the critical challenges and stakeholder conflicts encountered during the renovation process, demonstrating how landscape revitalisation, industrial transformation, and digital empowerment jointly facilitate multi-dimensional value creation. As the birthplace of Mazu culture, the case area exemplifies how rural landscapes, spatial resources, and local industries can be holistically upgraded to achieve integrated value in the material environment, economic development, socio-cultural vitality, and ecological preservation. Furthermore, multi-stakeholder collaboration not only enhances the precision of rural landscape management but also generates positive incentives for community engagement and benefit-sharing. By implementing refined identification and design techniques, community-led interventions, supply-chain restructuring, and digital empowerment, a virtuous cycle of landscape improvement and value creation emerges. This study endeavours to enrich theoretical discussions on rural construction and design, while providing executable pathways for collaborative governance and value creation in similar rural contexts.
[1]中共中央国务院.中共中央国务院关于进一步深化农村改革扎实推进乡村全面振兴的意见[EB/OL].(2025-01-01)[2025-02-23].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202502/content_7005158.htm.
[2]李骏,田琦,林岭.一次超越建造本体的乡村微更新探索——以重庆三河村公共空间营造为例[J].新建筑,2020(02):76-81.
[3]宋美杰,李嘉欣.“地·产·人”设计翻转与地方创生路径研究——以台湾创生成果联合特展为例[J].艺术与设计(理论),2021,2(08):35-7.
[4]高强,周丽.协同治理视阈下乡村建设实践样态解析——基于江苏常熟“千村美居”工程的案例观察[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,22(06):22-33.
[5]郭永久,王依凡.地方创生语境下艺术介入乡村建设策略优化研究[J].艺术与设计(理论),2023,2(09):38-41.
[6] KIM B,CHOE S.Collaborations and Conflicts in Rural Village Revitalization in Korea's Post-New Village Movement Era[J].Journal of Rural Studies,68,39-48,2019.
[7]何寅嵩.“自建”与“他建”[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2021.
[8]周春霞.新乡贤助力乡村振兴:村庄差异、新乡贤类别与作用模式选择——以粤西地区Z市四类村庄为例[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2024,50(03):80-95.
[9]魏成,韦灵琛,邓海萍,等.社会资本视角下的乡村规划与宜居建设[J].规划师,2016,32(05):124-130.
[10]赵青宇.乡村景观风貌保护与建设的思考及策略探讨[C]//中国城市规划学会.多元与包容--2012中国城市规划年会论文集(10.风景园林规划).江苏省城市发展研究所,2012:216-224.
[11]徐蕾.乡村景观风貌在城中村社区化改造中的展现[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2012.
[12]吴嘉祺.杭州翙岗村传统村落历史场所的依恋感知及景观提升研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2023.
[13]RAY C.Editorial.The eu leader Programme:Rural Development Laboratory[J].Sociologia Ruralis,2000,40(2):163-71.
[14]黄巨臣,刘畅.地方高校促进乡村高质量振兴的协同机制构建[J].教育科学,2024,40(06):88-93.
[15]吴蔓.乡村全过程驻村规划与建设落实机制探究--以花瑶白水洞村为例[C]//中国城市规划学会,合肥市人民政府.美丽中国,共建共治共享--2024中国城市规划年会论文集(20乡村规划).长沙:湖南大学建筑与规划学院,2024:705-715.
[16]潘斌,陈天好,黄晓雯,等.陪伴式乡村规划建设模式与路径研究[J].规划师,2022,38(04):121-126.
[17]林杭锋.元治理视域下乡村振兴工作队功能实现的困境与纾解策略研究[D].上海:华东政法大学,2023.
[18]HE Z,ZHANG R,LI G.Rethinking rural revitalization:Integration of multi-stakeholders in collaborative governance[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2021,82,325-337.
[19]张若曦,张乐敏,黄宇轩.基于数孪技术的聚落风貌三维控制研究--以湄洲岛宫下片区为例[J].城市建筑,2021,18(19):63-7+133.
[20]徐晨鹏,李晶晶.基于倾斜摄影技术的乡村风貌调查方法与应用场景研究[J].建设科技,2023(08):56-8.
[21]席春芳.3S技术在全域土地综合整治中的应用--以广东省肇庆市怀集县冷坑镇为例[J].华北自然资源,2022(05):84-6.
[22]刘晓燕.京郊妫河沿岸乡村景观风貌研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2010.
[23]郑文长,樊海强,张鹰.乡村地方创生模式及实施路径研究--以嵩口镇为例[J].建筑与文化,2021(10):74-6.
[24]徐鹏,杜晓雪.基于AIGC技术的山西省乡村建筑风貌特征识别及整治引导设计研究[C]//中国城市规划学会,合肥市人民政府.美丽中国,共建共治共享--2024中国城市规划年会论文集(06城市规划新技术应用).太原:山西省城乡规划设计研究院有限公司乡村规划设计研究所,太原市迎泽区松桥小学校,2024:28-36.
[25]钱玲燕,干靓,张立,等.德国乡村的功能重构与内生型发展[J].国际城市规划,2020,35(05):6-13.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16414/j.wa.20250616.001
中图分类号:D422.6;F323
引用信息:
[1]张若曦,张雨心,尹巧玉,等.人地产融合下乡村建设协同治理与价值创造路径研究[J].世界建筑,2025,No.422(09):16-21.DOI:10.16414/j.wa.20250616.001.
基金信息:
国家社科基金项目项目批准号:24BMZ089