| 58 | 0 | 19 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
以明代夯土长城为代表的大型线性遗产是世界文化遗产的重要组成部分,正面临着自然环境变化影响下快速侵蚀和消亡的危机,亟须完成对其病害调查的保护基础性工作。本文基于预防性保护视角,构建了“调查—量化—评估”三位一体的大型线性遗产数字化技术路径,系统解析夯土长城病害特征并实现风险评估。通过无人机低空摄影测量技术完成明长城全线高精度三维建模与多时相图像采集,建立动态演化的数字三维模型,揭示长城墙体底部掏蚀病害发育的底部掏蚀、局部坍塌、整体失稳劣化时序规律。结合形态特征量化指标与三维点云模型分析,提出病害劣化风险分级体系,实现单一区段病害风险的精准定位与动态监测。相较于传统保护模式,本文提出的技术框架通过“监测—评估—预警”闭环管理,使遗产保护资源的配置效率得到结构性优化,为文化遗产病害诊断建立基础的数据底座并提供科学的参考依据,以期推动不可移动文物建筑保护与修复工作的进一步发展。
Abstract:Large-scale linear heritage sites,exemplified by the rammed-earth Ming Great Wall,constitute vital components of World Cultural Heritage.These sites face a crisis of rapid erosion and loss driven by environmental changes,necessitating urgent baseline conservation measures grounded in deterioration surveys.Adopting a preventive conservation framework,this paper constructs an integrated "investigation-quantification-evaluation" digital workflow for large-scale linear heritage.This framework systematically analyzes deterioration characteristics in the rammed-earth Great Wall and facilitates risk assessment.High-precision 3D modelling and multi-temporal image acquisition of the Ming Great Wall were completed using low-altitude UAV photogrammetry.By establishing dynamically evolving digital 3D models,the study reveals the sequential deterioration pattern of basal sapping in Great Wall segments:basal sapping,localized collapse,and overall instability.Combining quantitative morphological indicators with 3D point cloud analysis,this study proposes a risk classification system for deterioration.This enables the precise localization and dynamic monitoring of deterioration risks for individual sections.Compared to traditional conservation approaches,the framework presented here optimizes resource allocation efficiency through a "monitoring-evaluationearly warning" closed-loop management system.It establishes a fundamental data substrate and provides a scientific basis for deterioration diagnosis in cultural heritage.This work aims to advance conservation and restoration efforts for immovable cultural heritage.
[1]赵海英,李最雄,韩文峰,等.甘肃境内长城遗址主要病害及保护研究[J].文物保护与考古科学,2007,19(1):28-32.
[2]孙满利,李最雄,王旭东,等.干旱区土遗址病害的分类研究[J].工程地质学报,2007,15(6):772-778,765.
[3]沈云霞.西北干旱区遗址土盐风化机理研究——以Na2SO4-NaCl混合盐为例[D].兰州:兰州大学,2017.
[4]崔凯,陈蒙蒙,谌文武,等.干湿与盐渍耦合作用下土遗址强度劣化机理[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2017,53(5):582-587,592.
[5]雷宏.嘉峪关墩台遗址病害发育特征及危险性评估[D].兰州:兰州大学,2020.
[6]戎卿文.欧洲建筑遗产预防性保护理论与方法的演进及其中国实践[D].南京:东南大学,2020.
[7]吴美萍,朱光亚.建筑遗产的预防性保护研究初探[J].建筑学报,2010(6):37-39.
[8]托雷,吴美萍.意大利视野下的建筑遗产预防性保护[J].中国文化遗产,2020(2):4,12-24.
[9]Bemis S P,Micklethwaite S,Turner D,et al.Ground-based and UAV-Based photogrammetry:A multi-scale, highresolution mapping tool for structural geology and paleoseismology[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2014,69:163-178.
[10]陈斯亮.UAV航测结合三维激光扫描的古栈道测绘建模[J].测绘科学,2017,42(8):152-156.
[11]Li Zhe,Wang Tianlian,Sun Su.Research on Quantitative Analysis Methods for the Spatial Characteristics of Traditional Villages Based on Three-Dimensional Point Cloud Data:A Case Study of Liukeng Village, Jiangxi,China[J].Land,2024,13(8).
[12]王天莲,李哲.明长城军事河防空间格局解析——以黄河山西段为例[J].风景园林,2025,32(01):124-132.
[13]谌文武,夏云云,杜昱民,等.不同含水率下遗址土体的抗风蚀能力研究[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2020,56(6):793-798.
[14]沈旸,相睿,常军富.明代夯土长城的建造技术特征及其保护——以大同镇段为例[J].建筑学报,2018(02):14-21.
[15]Cui Kai,Du Yumin,Zhang Yinghui,et al.An evaluation system for the development of scaling off at earthen sites in arid areas in NW China[J].Heritage Science,2019,7(1):14.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16414/j.wa.20260529.001
中图分类号:TU-87
引用信息:
[1]王天莲,李哲.预防性保护视角下明长城掏蚀病害特征解析与风险评估[J].世界建筑,2026,No.432(07):32-36.DOI:10.16414/j.wa.20260529.001.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目批准号:525B2126
2026-05-29
2026-05-29
2026-05-29