| 91 | 0 | 27 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本研究以上海殷行社区为例,采用卡方检验识别老年居民分龄行为差异,提取步行距离和活动频率两个差异最为显著的行为参数,并将其纳入改进的两步移动搜索模型,量化不同类型公共空间的分龄可达性差异。结果表明:与引入分龄行为参数并按年龄结构加权的可达性结果相比,采用全年龄组统一行为参数会系统性高估公共空间实际供需匹配水平;不同类型正规公共空间对可达性的影响存在显著差异;且正规公共空间可达性不足与非正规公共空间分布显著相关。建议老龄化社区公共空间建设基于老年居民分龄行为差异,将非正规公共空间纳入公共空间体系。
Abstract:This study takes the Yinhang community in Shanghai as a case study,uses chi-square tests to identify age-segmented behavioural differences among elderly residents,and selects walking distance and activity frequency as the two behavioural parameters with the most significant inter-age differences.These parameters are then incorporated into an improved two-step floating catchment area model to quantify age-segmented accessibility differences across different types of public spaces.The results show that,compared with accessibility measures that incorporate age-segmented behavioural parameters and are weighted by the age structure of elderly residents,using uniform behavioural parameters for all elderly age groups systematically overestimates the actual level of supply-demand matching of public spaces;different types of formal public spaces have significantly different impacts on accessibility;and insufficient accessibility of formal public spaces is significantly associated with the spatial distribution of informal public spaces.The study suggests that public space development in aging communities should be grounded in age-segmented behavioural differences of elderly residents and incorporate informal public spaces into the overall public space system.
[1]Statista. China:Population Share Aged 60 and Older until 2100[EB/OL].[2025-04-08].https://www.statista.com/statistics/251529/share-of-persons-aged-60-andolder-in-the-chinese-population/.
[2]王思斌.我国城市社区福利服务的弱可获得性及其发展[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2009,49(1):133-139.
[3]吴志建,王竹影,朱建勇,等.主观和客观建成环境对老年居民户外体力活动的影响[J].首都体育学院学报,2023,35(3):317-325.
[4]刘泉,钱征寒,黄丁芳.15分钟生活圈的空间模式演化特征与趋势[J].城市规划学刊,2020(6):94-101.
[5]Dannefer D.Age Stratification[M]//SMELSER N J,BALTES P B. International Encyclopedia of the Social&Behavioral Sciences.Oxford:Pergamon,2001:278-283.
[6]Neugarten B L.Age groups in American society and the rise of the young-old[J].The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,1974,415:187-198.
[7]楼宇青,金荷仙,张丽.杭州春季城市公园老年居民行为抽样调查与分析[J].中国园林,2019,35(3):66-70.
[8]宋聚生,孙艺,谢亚梅.基于老年社群活动特征的空间规划设计策略——以深圳典型社区户外活动空间为例[J].城市规划,2017, 41(5):27-36.
[9]黄建中,张芮琪,胡刚钰.基于时空间行为的老年居民日常生活圈研究——空间识别与特征分析[J].城市规划学刊,2019(3):87-95.
[10]柴彦威,马静,张文佳.基于巡回的北京市居民出行时空间决策的社区分异[J].地理研究,2010,29(10):1725-1734.
[11]张纯,柴彦威,李昌霞.北京城市老年居民的日常活动路径及其时空特征[J].地域研究与开发,2007(4):116-120.
[12]Tao Zhuolin,Cheng Yang:Research Progress of the two-step Floating Catchment Area Method and Extensions[J].Progress in Geography,2016,35:589-599.
[13]国家统计局.第七次人口普查主要数据[EB/OL].[2024-06-28].https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/pcsj/rkpc/d7c/.
[14]王宏亮,吴健生.城市公共资源与人口分布的空间适配性分析——以深圳市为例[J].北京大学学报自然科学版,2021,57(6):1143-1152.
[15]Liu Lulu,Chen Yaowen,Xiang Haiqing,et al. Measuring and optimizing the spatial accessibility of primary health care in remote and rural areas:a case study of Liannan Yao Autonomous County in China[J].BMC Health Services Research,2024,24(1):1100.
[16]Wan Neng, Zou Bin,Sternberg T.A threestep floating catchment area method for analyzing spatial access to health services[J].International Journal of Geographical Information Science,2012,26(6):1073-1089.
[17]杨晓琳,邓毓雯,夏大为,等.“双老”社区居民自发建造行为与公共空间要素关联性研究——以广州珠光社区为例[J].城市发展研究,2023,30(11):1-8.
[18]孙旭阳,汪丽君,廖攀,等.旧城区街角小微公共空间老年居民自发参与性研究[J].建筑学报,2021(S1):65-69.
1)上海市“美丽家园”三年行动计划(2021-2023年)是一项综合性的老旧社区更新工程,旨在通过微更新与精细化改造(翻新道路、增设社区口袋公园等),为居民创造更高品质的生活空间。
2 )殷行社区第七次人口普查数据显示,60~69岁、70~79岁及80岁以上占比分别为60%、25%和15%;本次问卷样本中,该3类年龄段占比分别为44%、39%和17%。
3 )按四分位数分组,分界点为213 m(25%分位)、323 m(中位数)、620 m(75%分位)。
4 )一天多次、一天一次、一周多次,量化值分别为0.8、0.50及0.2,数值越大说明公共空间使用越频繁。
基本信息:
DOI:10.16414/j.wa.2026.04.008
中图分类号:TU984.12
引用信息:
[1]张若彤,王一,林中杰.基于改进两步移动搜索法的老龄化社区公共空间分龄可达性测度研究[J].世界建筑,2026,No.429(04):78-83.DOI:10.16414/j.wa.2026.04.008.
2025-11-18
2025
2026-01-06
2026-04-02
2026
1
2026-04-15
2026-04-15